Journal paper how many words

It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission from the copyright owner to reproduce figures and tables that have been published elsewhere. Tables and figures without such evidence are assumed to originate from the author. Supplementary Files Authors may submit supplementary files to be made available alongside their article. Online Submission Authors must submit their manuscripts through the online submission platform, comply with our instructions for authors.

Submissions by email will not be considered. Authors will receive an automatic acknowledgment email upon a successful submission. This email will also request that they provide a list of 5 potential reviewers for their manuscripts.

First Check The Editorial staff will make a first assessment of the submitted article. Manuscripts that do not comply with the instructions for authors may be returned to the authors or rejected altogether.

Contact by Editorial Staff The Editorial staff will contact the corresponding author with a decision as to whether the manuscript will be considered for publication in the journal and sent for peer-review. At this point of the process, authors should have already emailed the Editorial staff their list of 5 potential reviewers, otherwise they will be reminded to do so. The list will be carefully reviewed by the Editorial staff and it is not guaranteed that the suggested researchers will be contacted to review the manuscript.

Authors who fail to provide a list of suitable and trustworthy reviewers may see their manuscripts immediately rejected for publication. Peer-Review Manuscripts will undergo a very stringent double-blind peer-review process, where both the identities of authors and reviewers remain undisclosed in order to guarantee the highest quality of the journal.

All manuscripts except for Editorials, Commentaries and Book Reviews will be sent out for review and at least two review reports per manuscript will be collected.

Even if, in principle, a double-blind peer-review system could allow this task to be performed by scholars who are acquainted with the authors, our Editorial Office still wishes reviews to be completed only by reviewers who do not have any recent professional contact with the authors in order to fully guarantee that there are no conflicts of interests and that reviews are indeed totally unbiased.

All reviewers will be selected and invited by the Editorial Office to review manuscripts according to the field of expertise of the submissions received. Reviewers will be asked to complete their review within two weeks, but are allowed to extend the review period in order to complete and submit their report. All relevant information for reviewers can be consulted in the Instructions for Reviewers. Decision After each round of peer-review, the Academic Editor s of the thematic issue will be asked to assess the submitted manuscript and the peer-review reports collected.

Decisions regarding each submission will be taken without exception by the Academic Editor s , guaranteeing the excellence and high standard of our decision-making process. The Academic Editor s may decide between the following options:. In order to guarantee swiftness of the editorial process, each manuscript will only be allowed two rounds of review and revisions. Authors are thus urged to address all issues raised by the reviewers directly after the first round of peer-review.

Copyediting After the manuscript is accepted for publication it will undergo a first stage of copy editing where the Editorial staff will correct any minor mistakes such as punctuation or references and check that all necessary information regarding the manuscript and authors has been provided. Authors will receive an edited version of their manuscript for author copy editing after acceptance of the manuscript for publication. This is the last stage where any substantial copy editing changes to the text are allowed the next stage—proofreading—is restricted to correcting typographical and layout errors.

Authors should carefully check the proofs for typographical or layout errors, and use the sticky notes tool to mark and explain any changes necessary. Publication After the final proofread manuscript has been received and the last corrections have been performed the manuscript will be published. The manuscript will be published in the thematic issue, and the author will be promptly informed as soon as the article is available online. In some cases, the publication may be delayed in order to guarantee that all articles are published simultaneously.

Splitting large manuscripts also only works if the material naturally splits. Sometimes it's the right thing to do, other times it would be salami slicing.

David Richerby I strongly disagree. In sub-sections of biology, there is not a lot, or even none, supplementary material — Emilie. Emilie I have no doubt that other areas may be different: please note that I qualified my answer accordingly.

My experience is primarily with synthetic biology and related study of cell regulation and interaction processes. I would recommend that if you have a different experience in other areas of biology that you post your own answer as wellI, at least, would be interested in learning about the differences. I would like very much to post my own answer, but biology is so wide. I think the question has to be more elaborate and give us precise field. A paper in ecology is more around words, even But even ecology is large and I can be wrong!

Featured on Meta. Now live: A fully responsive profile. Related Hot Network Questions. Academia Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled. Accept all cookies Customize settings. Library Connect. Societies' Update. Healthcare Professionals. This article is the third in the series. Previous articles were: Six things to do before writing your manuscript 11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously Four steps to preparing your first draft Here is the process I use: Think about the topic you want to present, for some days or weeks.

Make figures and tables. Then write as quickly as possible, as if thinking out loud. Get everything down, ignoring spelling, grammar, style and troublesome words. Correct and rewrite only when the whole text is on paper. Polishing your manuscript Use good English Unfortunately for non-native English speakers, language is an important problem.

Look at this complaint from an editor: This paper fell well below my threshold. I refuse to spend time trying to understand what the author is trying to say. Besides, I really want to send a message that they can't submit garbage to us and expect us to fix it. My rule of thumb is that if there are more than 6 grammatical errors in the abstract, then I don't waste my time carefully reading the rest. Avoid these common problems: Sentences that don't follow each other logically Sentences that are difficult to understand by non-initiated readers e.

Long sentences do not make the writing more professional; they only confuse readers. Nowadays, the average length of sentences in scientific writing is about 12 to 17 words. It is said that we read one sentence in one breath. Long sentences choke readers. After the reviewers recommended using shorter sentences, I modified it to the following: … Conversely, applying M-AMBI the explained variability reaches until The mismatch in the comparison of both methods in terms of degraded-undegraded equivalences was of Length of the manuscript Again, look at the journal's Guide for Authors, but an ideal length for a manuscript is 25 to 40 pages, double spaced, including essential data only.

This is related to the high concentration of organic matter. Although it was…" Excessive use of subordinate clauses in one sentence e. Phrases without meaning. Learn from the following comments from an Editor: "Never say 'and references therein. You start the conclusions "In this paper, we have prepared The samples were prepared in the laboratory! Repetitive words with similar meanings, such as "schematic diagram," "research work," etc.

It's better to use the words separately: "this scheme," "that diagram," "the research was …," "the work done was …" Other writing don'ts : Passive voice for intransitive verbs which do not have a direct object ; only transitive verbs can have passive forms.